top of page

Removal of Default Notice from Credit file Case Study

winnie onyekwere

Remove CCJUK logo

Karen

“Incredibly quick response, complete understanding of my needs and appropriate action taken for the support I required”.




The issue


This case study focuses on clients Karen and partner Abdil, expectant new parents and how we managed to help them remove a Default Notice from their credit file. Our clients were planning on purchasing a new car on finance from their bank in time before the birth of their child. In advance of their application for a loan, our clients obtained a copy of their credit file from the credit reference agency. It was noted that an adverse entry had been made in the file. A Default Notice for £12,000 had been placed against their joint account, in their names on a credit report. Our clients did not have any recollection of ever receiving such a Notice from the bank in respect of a previous loan which had been paid off some time ago.


Our clients wrote to the bank requesting a copy of the original Default Notice and any Deed of Assignment if the debt had been sold on to a third party. The bank sent a response to our clients informing them that, after checking with the credit reference agency, it showed when the account was satisfied via a full and final payment. The Default Notice was also marked as being “Satisfied” in the credit report. It was clear from the bank’s response, citing difficulties to delays in obtaining relevant information, and merely repeating what our clients already knew, that they were deflecting from the real question raised by our clients’ letter to substantiate on the information requested about not ever receiving the original Default Notice from the bank. The request for information was made no less than three times to the bank over a period of four months. On each occasion our clients received the same reply. By this time, the odds on getting the bank to remove the Default Notice from our clients’ credit report appeared to them to be futile.


The solution


Karen and Abdil approached us to seek a solution to the matter. We realised that from the written responses to our clients, the bank was deliberately prevaricating and it had become clear that the correct paperwork and procedure had not been followed. We requested a deadlock letter from the bank. Our intervention prompted the bank within days to confirm that they were not able to obtain copies of the original account documentation of the Default Notice.


The outcome

  • There had been a clear breach on the part of the bank of their systems and procedure, which had not been correctly followed.

  • We forced the bank to remove the Default Notice from our clients’ credit file. They in turn notified the credit reference agency of the correction to be made to our clients’ credit file

  • After six weeks we advised our clients to order a new copy of their credit file. The credit file showed that the credit reference agency had removed the Default Notice from the credit report.

  • Our clients received an apology from the bank.

  • Karen and Abdil were able to move forward to obtain a new loan to purchase a motor vehicle on favourable credit terms from the bank and all in time before the birth of their baby


If you require help, we would be happy to help, just connect below for a free initial no obligation chat or call 0333 3444 945. Alternatively, if you know someone who might be interested share this with them.




0 comments

Comments


Site Map

REMOVE CCJ UK                                               













          
welcome@removeccjuk.com
Privacy Policy
Terms and Conditions
Our Guarantee






 
News

Send us a message
and we’ll get back to you shortly.

I have read the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy


This statement is to explain our status in offering to provide you with support services. We are not solicitors or barristers, and we are not regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority
SRA  or the Bar Standards Board. We are a mediation service. We hold professional indemnity insurance. We assist clients in an administrative capacity only. We can provide you with legal assistance as a litigation friend and can arrange representation for you before certain tribunals and in the small claims court via a regulated third-party court advocacy provider or barrister direct. We cannot exercise rights of audience in court meaning that we have no automatic right to represent you in any open court and cannot go to court on record without the express permission of the court. You will remain a litigant in person (LIP) throughout the duration of your case. We can help you to complete court paperwork and assist you with drafting documents and guide you through the court process. You do not need to use a solicitor for this type of service as they are usually significantly more expensive. You cannot make a complaint about us to the Bar Standards Board,  Law Society, Legal Ombudsman or the SRA which can adjudicate on complaints brought against practising barrister and solicitor. We are not regulated and fall outside of their jurisdiction. If you have any questions about our service and how we work, we welcome you to contact us so we can explain in full and e-mail you details of our services.

RCCJUK is a subsiduary of Concilium Dispute Resolution 2025 © registered office  122 Old Oak Lodge Maryon Road  London SE78DH 

Accessibility Statement
bottom of page